Julian Assange’s possible final appeal ruling to be handed down by British High Court

close Video

Fox News Flash top headlines for March 25

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what’s clicking on Foxnews.com.

Join Fox News for access to this content Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge. Please enter a valid email address. By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided. Having trouble? Click here.

Judges in Britain will rule Tuesday on whether Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will be extradited to the U.S. or if he will be allowed to appeal his extradition.

Two senior judges on the British High Court will decide Assange’s fate on Tuesday at 10:30 a.m. GMT, or 6:30 a.m. ET. A full appeal hearing could come if the High Court rules in Assange’s favor on Tuesday but, if he loses this appeal, his remaining options would be limited.

“This is it. DECISION TOMORROW,” Assange’s wife Stella wrote on X.

Assange, 52, is facing espionage charges for publishing classified U.S. military documents 14 years ago but has not yet been tried in a U.S. courtroom as he fled the country. 

JULIAN ASSANGE’S US EXTRADITION HEARING WRAPS UP IN LONDON, DECISION NOT EXPECTED UNTIL AT LEAST NEXT MONTH

The British High Court will hand down its ruling Tuesday about whether Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will be allowed to make a full appeal challenging his extradition to the U.S. (Fox News Digital/Landon Mion)

Tuesday’s ruling follows a two-day hearing last month, which may have been Assange’s final appeal attempting to block his extradition to the U.S.

Should the court disallow a full appeal, Assange could then make a last request before the European Court of Human Rights. His supporters fear, however, an unfavorable result Tuesday would result in his extradition.

Assange would then face trial in Alexandria, Virginia, as he is facing 17 charges for allegedly receiving, possessing and communicating classified information to the public under the Espionage Act, and one charge alleging a conspiracy to commit computer intrusion.

If convicted, he could be sentenced to up to 175 years in an American maximum-security prison. 

Assange is facing espionage charges for publishing classified U.S. military documents 14 years ago. (Getty Images)

The charges were brought by the Trump administration’s Justice Department over WikiLeaks’ 2010 publication of cables leaked by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning detailing alleged war crimes committed by the U.S. government in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, detention camp. The materials also exposed instances of the CIA engaging in torture and rendition.

He has been held at London’s high-security Belmarsh Prison since he was removed from the Ecuadorian Embassy on April 11, 2019. 

A U.K. District Judge rejected the U.S. extradition request in 2021 over possible self-harm concerns if Assange was held in U.S. prisons. 

Higher courts later overturned that decision after receiving assurances from the U.S. about his treatment, and the British government signed an extradition order in June 2022.

UK HIGH COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN ASSANGE’S US EXTRADITION CASE WITHOUT HIM PRESENT DUE TO HEALTH REASONS

U.S. prosecutors argued at last month’s hearing that Assange put innocent lives at risk by publishing the materials and went beyond journalism in his efforts to obtain and publish classified U.S. government documents. They claimed Assange encouraged and helped Manning steal military and diplomatic files that WikiLeaks later published, and that doing so jeopardized lives.

They did not provide evidence that WikiLeaks put anyone in danger by publishing the documents. It is also a common practice for journalists to ask a source to provide additional documents or materials.

Julian Assange’s lawyers are on their final U.K. legal challenge to stop the WikiLeaks founder from being sent to the United States to face spying charges. (AP)

The Obama administration in 2013 decided not to indict Assange over WikiLeaks’ 2010 publication of classified cables because it would have had to also indict journalists from major news outlets who published the same materials. Former President Obama also commuted Manning’s 35-year sentence for violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses to seven years in January 2017, and Manning, who had been imprisoned since 2010, was released later that year.

But the Justice Department under former President Trump later moved to indict Assange under the Espionage Act, and the Biden administration has continued to pursue his prosecution.

REP. MASSIE BRINGING JULIAN ASSANGE’S BROTHER AS GUEST TO STATE OF THE UNION

Stella Assange, wife of Julian Assange, speaks besides a poster of Julian Assange at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2024. (AP)

The CIA was also revealed to have spied on Assange and his lawyers. A judge recently ruled that a lawsuit brought against the CIA for spying on his visitors can move forward.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

No publisher had been charged under the Espionage Act until Assange, and many press freedom groups have said his prosecution sets a dangerous precedent intended to criminalize journalism.

Last week, Assange’s U.S. lawyer said his legal team saw no indication of a resolution to the case against him following a report that the U.S. Justice Department was considering allowing him to plead guilty to a reduced charge.

Reuters contributed to this report.